Log in

No account? Create an account
The Nature of Paradim Shift :))) - Valse oubliée [entries|archive|friends|userinfo]

[ userinfo | livejournal userinfo ]
[ archive | journal archive ]
[ delicious | aruslan's delicious ]

[Links:| Tags Profile Friends FG1 PP gamedev XNA FF Entries Comments Memories ]

The Nature of Paradim Shift :))) [Jan. 22nd, 2006|11:59 am]
[Current Mood |:)))))]

If history repeats, the nature of the paradigm shift would have the following properties:
  • It will be coded by one, two, or three geeks who are fed up
  • It will be all over the news for two days before disappearing again
  • It will have an open source tool
  • It would be bootstrapped off the old paradigm
  • It will be instantly dismissed by scores of developers
  • It will be instantly dismissed by scores of "developers", who will write books about why it's not important
  • Once it was understood by a few, a slew of companies will arise claiming to have a tool that implements it
  • Microsoft will claim to have one ready in four months, called Visual NewParadigm.NET
  • Years later some non-original tools will actually implement it.
  • It's benefits may be relative to the old paradigm (ala procedural vs. OOP), not necessarily superior
  • Once it is understood, something beyond it will arise iteratively, for a while they will be called the same thing, until they become distinct.
  • It's not going to be programming language as we know it. Maybe some combination of architectural, evolutionary, and aspect techniques
  • Lisp weenies will claim prior art
  • The Perl community will claim it's been in the Perl Language all along, you just have to say "#(&&->$\/\//@mumble->frabitz;;" to accomplish it.
  • Even after it's established by many as the Next Big Thing, people will have arguments as to what it is. (cf Nobody Agrees What Is OO)
  • It won't be where the architects/scientists were looking
  • Xerox Parc probably threw it out as unusuable, years ago.

цитата из Beyond Object Orientation

[User Picture]From: loyso_b
2006-01-22 09:30 am (UTC)
это пять. :)
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: kmmbvnr
2006-01-22 04:56 pm (UTC)
Бу-га-га :)

>>Xerox Parc probably threw it out as unusuable, years ago.

Намек на AOP?
(Reply) (Thread)
[User Picture]From: aruslan
2012-10-05 10:32 pm (UTC)
Намёк на всё, что делала Xerox PARC, я думаю :)
(Reply) (Parent) (Thread)